Tag Archives: Google

Officially Enchanting

Enchantment by Guy Kawasaki

I never thought I would have been lucky enough to be in the presence of Guy Kawasaki.  Yet, Wednesday, April 4th, I had the great fortune to hear Guy speak at Rackspace in San Antonio, TX.  It was an open, easy Q and A conversation.  He spoke about his latest project, an eBook, “What the Plus! Google+ for the Rest Of Us“.  Although I have not read the book, Guy makes the case for utilizing Google+, because, quite simply “Google is Google”.  It’s SEO that everyone can understand; “if you write good stuff, Google will find it”.

A few more interesting/key points Guy made:

  • Regarding privacy; don’t do stupid things.
  • Regarding social media; it’s fast, free and ubiquitous and could replace traditional marketing in the near future
  • Rules for engaging people through social media:
  1. Act like a person
  2. Always be providing value, which includes information and assistance
  3. It’s about caring; mixing human emotion, interesting facts and good ideas, (and good deals!)
  • Want to know who does social media right?  Check these three companies out:
  1. Comcast
  2. Virgin
  3. Ford
  • “It’s so hard to get followers on Pinterest“.

In closing; most companies make the mistake of defining themselves by what they do; not what they provide.  When you define yourself by what you provide, it’s a lot easier to adjust for the bends in the road.

For Impatient Web Users, an Eye Blink Is Just Too Long to Wait

February 29, 2012
By 

Wait a second.

No, that’s too long.

Remember when you were willing to wait a few seconds for a computer to respond to a click on a Web site or a tap on a keyboard? These days, even 400 milliseconds — literally the blink of an eye — is too long, as Google engineers have discovered. That barely perceptible delay causes people to search less.

“Subconsciously, you don’t like to wait,” said Arvind Jain, a Google engineer who is the company’s resident speed maestro. “Every millisecond matters.”

Google and other tech companies are on a new quest for speed, challenging the likes of Mr. Jain to make fast go faster. The reason is that data-hungry smartphones and tablets are creating frustrating digital traffic jams, as people download maps, video clips of sports highlights, news updates or recommendations for nearby restaurants. The competition to be the quickest is fierce.

People will visit a Web site less often if it is slower than a close competitor by more than 250 milliseconds (a millisecond is a thousandth of a second).

“Two hundred fifty milliseconds, either slower or faster, is close to the magic number now for competitive advantage on the Web,” said Harry Shum, a computer scientist and speed specialist at Microsoft.

The performance of Web sites varies, and so do user expectations. A person will be more patient waiting for a video clip to load than for a search result. And Web sites constantly face trade-offs between visual richness and snappy response times. As entertainment and news sites, like The New York Times Web site, offer more video clips and interactive graphics, that can slow things down.

But speed matters in every context, research shows. Four out of five online users will click away if a video stalls while loading.

On a mobile phone, a Web page takes a leisurely nine seconds to load, according to Google, which tracks a huge range of sites from the homes of large companies to the legions of one-person bloggers. Download times on personal computers average about six seconds worldwide, and about 3.5 seconds on average in the United States. The major search engines, Google and Microsoft’s Bing, are the speed demons of the Web, analysts say, typically delivering results in less than a second.

The hunger for speed on smartphones is a new business opportunity for companies like Akamai Technologies, which specializes in helping Web sites deliver services quicker. Later this month, Akamai plans to introduce mobile accelerator software to help speed up the loading of a Web site or app.

The government too recognizes the importance of speed in mobile computing. In February, Congress opened the door to an increase in network capacity for mobile devices, proposing legislation that permits the auction of public airwaves now used for television broadcasts to wireless Internet suppliers.

Overcoming speed bumps is part of the history of the Internet. In the 1990s, as the World Wide Web became popular, and crowded, it was called the World Wide Wait. Invention and investment answered the call.

Laying a lot of fiber optic cable for high-speed transmission was the first solution. But beyond bandwidth, the Web got faster because of innovations in software algorithms for routing traffic, and in distributing computer servers around the world, nearer to users, as a way to increase speed.

Akamai, which grew out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Laboratory for Computer Science, built its sizable business doing just that. Most major Web sites use Akamai’s technology today.

The company sees the mobile Internet as the next big challenge. “Users’ expectations are getting shorter and shorter, and the mobile infrastructure is not built for that kind of speed,” said Tom Leighton, co-founder and chief scientist at Akamai, who is also an M.I.T. professor. “And that’s an opportunity for us.”

The need for speed itself seems to be accelerating. In the early 1960s, the two professors at Dartmouth College who invented the BASIC programming language, John Kemeny and Thomas Kurtz, set up a network in which many students could tap into a single, large computer from keyboard terminals.

“We found,” they observed, “that any response time that averages more than 10 seconds destroys the illusion of having one’s own computer.”

In 2009, a study by Forrester Research found that online shoppers expected pages to load in two seconds or fewer — and at three seconds, a large share abandon the site. Only three years earlier a similar Forrester study found the average expectations for page load times were four seconds or fewer.

The two-second rule is still often cited as a standard for Web commerce sites. Yet experts in human-computer interaction say that rule is outdated. “The old two-second guideline has long been surpassed on the racetrack of Web expectations,” said Eric Horvitz, a scientist at Microsoft’s research labs.

Google, which harvests more Internet ad revenue than any other company, stands to benefit more than most if the Internet speeds up. Mr. Jain, who worked at Microsoft and Akamai before joining Google in 2003, is an evangelist for speed both inside and outside the company. He leads a “Make the Web Faster” program, begun in 2009. He also holds senior positions in industry standards groups.

Speed, Mr. Jain said, is a critical element in all of Google’s products. There is even a companywide speed budget; new offerings and product tweaks must not slow down Google services. But there have been lapses.

In 2007, for example, after the company added popular new offerings like Gmail, things slowed down enough that Google’s leaders issued a “Code Yellow” and handed out plastic stopwatches to its engineers to emphasize that speed matters.

Still, not everyone is in line with today’s race to be faster. Mr. Kurtz, the Dartmouth computer scientist who is the co-inventor of BASIC, is now 84, and marvels at how things have changed.

Computers and networks these days, Mr. Kurtz said, “are fast enough for me.”

The New York Times

This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers here or use the “Reprints” tool that appears next to any article. Visit www.nytreprints.com for samples and additional information. Order a reprint of this article now

Our Brave New World of No Privacy

Do you care if the words “personal” and/or “private” have no meaning? A curious and interesting consideration. The definition of privacy– “a. the quality or state of being apart from company or observation; b. freedom from unauthorized intrusion”.

On March 1st, Google’s old privacy tools/policies and old terms of service will be replaced by their new policy on privacy*, with no opt-out choice and new terms of service policy.   One of Google’s goals as stated at the top of the, (soon to be outdated), “Privacy Tools” page states:  “One of our goals at Google is to give users meaningful choices to protect your privacy.”  No longer.

Especially interesting; Google made the choice to release their new “no-privacy” policy on the heels of a disappointing 4th quarter earnings report.  I’m truly puzzled.  Facebook users have, traditionally, been very unhappy when technological glitches, or “new announcements/policies” have even hinted, (or succeeded), at taking away the ability to control their privacy.   Yet Google, (after recently launching Google+), is counting on a no privacy policy to boost earnings?   While it’s true that I’m sure I have a lot less privacy than I actually think I do, I still like to think that I have some control over what I choose to “share with the world”.  It’s very hard for my brain to truly comprehend what life would/will be like if the words “privacy” and “personal” are devoid of meaning.

Google’s “spin” on the new “no privacy” policy is they’re just helping us enjoy an enriched life filled with more fun.  Thanks to the new, no privacy policy, not only will life be more fun, but so much more fulfilling as Google “helps” us by trolling our no-longer-private-emails and combining that with other platforms/services:

  • In short, we’ll treat you as a single user across all our products, which will mean a simpler, more intuitive Google experience.
  • Our search box now gives you great answers not just from the web, but your personal stuff too.
  • But there’s so much more that Google can do to help you by sharing more of your information with … well, you.  (Huh?  Oh yeah, I get it, Google is just letting us know that we no longer have the right to “opt out” of sharing our information with ourselves?  This has to win the PRIZE for STUPID statement of all time!)  Click here for a MUST HEAR conversation!

This “no-privacy” policy will take effect across all 60+ Google owned/operated platforms, including Gmail, YouTube, Google+, etc.  Click here to see a list of Google’s products, services & apps and here for a list of Google acquisitions.  They don’t call this “data mining” they call it “data liberation”.  On the “data liberation” page, is the statement:

Users should be able to control the data they store in any of Google’s products.  Our team’s goal is to make it easier to move data in and out.

If you’re concerned about “no privacy”, take the time to utilize the information on the “data liberation” page to remove data you have stored in anything related to Google.

”Perhaps Google’s new no privacy policy has to do with a settlement between Google and the Federal Trade Commission that forbids Google from misrepresenting how it uses personal information and from sharing an individual’s data without prior approval.

Have we have reached the “Zero Moment of Truth?

What do you think?  If you’re concerned, please share this!

*Let us hope that Google’s new “no-privacy” policy doesn’t include “Google Wallet”.  Although, if you have any Google app installed on your smart phone, technically, Google can track where you’re at, what you’re doing and what you buy; all without your permission.

Don’t Forget to Say Thank-You

Received the following email from Google today, and wanted to share it.  We shouldn’t forget to thank all representatives that stood against SOPA & PIPA.  🙂

Thank you for taking action!

Hi Julieanna Last week you stood with millions of Americans to protect online freedom and innovation. Congress heard you, and delayed consideration of the PIPA and SOPA bills, which — if enacted — would censor the Web and impose harmful regulations on American businesses. We hope that today you will join us in thanking your representatives for protecting the Internet. And we want to thank you, again, for your actions last week. We are humbled that so many of you rallied around what we believe is the most transformative invention in history.

Until next time,

The Google team